PDA

View Full Version : Alpha Flight ... No Respect?



birdygirl
08-15-2004, 01:21 AM
You know, this is really sad.

I remember when Alpha Flight was first introduced, way back in 1979, that fans were excited about it and treated it with as much respect as the Uncanny X-Men. I even had it from John Byrne himself (at the 1979 New York Thanksgiving Con) that Marvel had received "a lot of positive feedback" on the team. From then on, the question constantly asked at cons and in Marvel letter columns of books where Alpha guest-starred was, "When will Alpha Flight get its own book?"

Finally, Alpha got its own series in 1983. I can initially remember how enthusiastic fans were over the book, and how they regarded it on a level with the X-Men, Avengers, and Fantastic Four.

And then, John Byrne left the book. The series struggled along for awhile under Bill Mantlo, (who, as I've mentioned before, started off with good ideas and a united team -- and then went downhill from there).

It wasn't until 1991 when I went to a then-AF writer's guest appearance at a comics store, that I learned an awful truth. Said writer, (who shall remain nameless), said that everyone at Marvel "hated" Alpha Flight, that he "hated" it also, and that he only took the book because no one else would touch it. (The writer left the book not long after that.)

I was discouraged to hear this. Why has Alpha, a once highly-regarded team and title, lost so much respect? When did it happen, and why? (I have my suspicions that this may have happened during Mantlo's run, but then I'm prejudiced. :P )

Any opinions on why Alpha Flight gets no respect?

kozzi24
08-15-2004, 02:39 AM
It was definitely Mantlo's run that iced the book. John Byrne's constant statements to the effect that they were all one-dimensional characters probably hasn't helped. Statements like the one you quote (if 1991, probably Nicienza) don't help. The artwork by John Calimee hurt a lot, especially as a follow-up to Jim Lee.
The biggest slip was probably the Byrne-Mantlo switch, because it was a switch between AF & Hulk of ENTIRE creative teams, including editors. The change in editors left Alpha without a guiding hand who had already been there. Both Byrne and O'Neil left Marvel shortly afterwards, so that might not have been prevented for too long anyway.
The original characters lend themselves well to humor, so maybe it's not a stretch that they became a joke.
Northstar's sexuality before it emerged as political correctness to have a gay character probably hurt as some writers or artists probably didn't want to get associated with "the gay book."
Editorial policy over time has also hurt. Alpha is not the Avengers. Avengers in other media has always been mixed. As in the Repo-Man episode of the X-Men cartoon, Alpha has a generally defined team that most people think of. That team is barely seen in v2 or v3, so the editorial decisions that harkened back to v1 #51 that allowed writers to so casually make their own team and call it Alpha has probably hurt the most.


The character's rep as a team in the confines of their fictional world is probably not much better. I think it became gradually known that they were an A-list team who kept themselves on the C-list behind Avengers, FF & X-Men because they couldn't stop fighting among themselves and their casualties didn't make them look "professional.". Look at the power base of the original team. They can handle dimensions, magic, raw power...anything but psychic attack. They have a few respectful allies... Sue Richards, Doc Strange, and a biased Wolvie among others... but I swear I remember Captain America scowling to himself through most of the times he's personally dealt with them, particlarly in the #97-100 arc.

Sir John A.
08-15-2004, 04:30 AM
If I remember correctly, AF v.2 was selling around 40 000 in Canada only when they cancelled it.

Today these numbers would be seen as not too bad!

I think Marvel was hoping on getting these 40 000 back and thought they were people who would pick up anything as long as the words "Alpha Flight" was in the title.

I think a lot of Canadian fans stuck it out through the bad times because they were just so happy to have a "Canadian" comic book. Unfortunately, I think this lead to Marvel taking the loyal readers for granted.

Its frustrating for me because we all know how GOOD AF COULD BE!

kozzi24
08-15-2004, 01:04 PM
Its frustrating for me because we all know how GOOD AF COULD BE!
Me too.
I think everyone needs to keep in mind that every year there is more competition for people entertainment time and money. Comics in general have dwindled, with readership nothing like there was back when video games were solid bars playing tennis with a single blip.
This day and age, you just CAN'T compare current numbers to the numbers of 5, 10, or 20 years ago, because the proportions are much different.

Mokole
08-15-2004, 05:19 PM
You're right. I don't know the numbers but the amount of comics sold today is much less than 1990. Too much going for the quick buck (crossovers galore, reboots, new universes, relaunching current titles, expanding current title lines, 'hot' artists and 'hot' writers...) has hurt, as it always does and always will.

Alpha Flight will appeal to fans who dropped X-Statix; fans who hate Marvel for Excalibur as it stands; fans who liked the old Excalibur; fans who liked Deadpool when Gail wrote it; fans who liked Thunderbolts before Marvel wrecked it. And of course regular comic fans.

Fans of solo titles and action/gore won't like AF. But they never have anyway. As this comic develops and grows it can only get better, so as long as we help promote it then that growth will happen. It's not like I'm helping Disney make another $150 billion, after all. :wink:

Canucklehead
08-15-2004, 10:12 PM
Do you think it might have anything to do with how Canada in general is seen today? I mean, anytime I hear Canada mentioned on tv or on movies, it seems like the entire Country is seen as a joke. How many times have I heard "They're not even a real country anyway" a la South Park movie, among others. I still hear the word "Hoser" even to this day! This was a comedy skit from the 70s! Is this how some think of us? "eh", "aboot", "hoser", "Dudley Do Right"?

How is our military seem throughout the world today? We have one or two 40+yo submarrines. For every hour our helicopters fly, they need 60 hours of repair. How do you think this effects other peoples vision of Canada? Do you think some may see the maple leaf on the cover and just chuckle to themselves? "What's the point of a Canadian Super team?" I certainly hope not!

Anyway, just a thought. I know most people are smarter then that, but it might be enough for a few to not bother with the series. It also doesn't help that Alpha hasn't made many appearences outside of the X-Men over the years. And everytime they seem to be sent for some stupid reason and be seen as jacka$$es.

Again, just a thought.
D.

kozzi24
08-16-2004, 03:43 AM
Not being Canadian, I have never linked Alpha to Canada as intrinsically as I probably should have. I think to Americans, the team's being Canadian made them exotic as every other team in the day (except WCAvengers (and short lived Champions & a brief later run of Defenders) was in New York. The Hulk was in the desert most of the time, and international heroes did nothing more than make brief appearances and then go home.
Byrne, being Canadian, set a few stories in specific areas, and he often gave great countryside scenes like the multipager of Sasquatch clearing the woods. He did give a sense of Canada as a vast and varied place. I could picture the Quebec Northstar grew up in and the neighborhood the Hudsons lived in.
Unfortunately, Scott has perpetuated the stereotypes of both "hosers" and "eh." With Puck 1 it was a characteristic. With Puck2, it's been a nauseating parody. I don't think there's any mean spirit behind that, only attempted humor, but I doubt that the trend does anything to allay your concerns.
In one way, dripping with caustic sarcasm, I don't think you have much to worry about because we Americans tend to be pretty ignorant of things beyond our borders.

Phil
08-16-2004, 05:22 PM
Unfortunately, Scott has perpetuated the stereotypes of both "hosers" and "eh." With Puck 1 it was a characteristic. With Puck2, it's been a nauseating parody.

a) Scott hasn't mentioned hosers - Scott doesn't write the solicits.
b) Even I use "eh"

ladymako71
08-16-2004, 05:59 PM
Like Phil, I say 'eh' a lot to in my normal speach pattern. it's not just a 'Canadian' thing...trust me. ;) I think any country with strong ties to the UK (ie: the commonwealth) has a bad habit of using the term...and often. ^^

kozzi24
08-16-2004, 06:08 PM
a) Scott hasn't mentioned hosers - Scott doesn't write the solicits.
b) Even I use "eh"

a) I don't know that he does, but the solicits do seem to be in his style. The AF solicits have been as different from the norm as the recap page in Alpha has been different from the others. Both seem to be in Scott style.

b) I'll bet you use it more like Judd does, not with the nauseating frequency of Puck2.

ladymako71
08-16-2004, 06:12 PM
I figure with the solicits, they keep in tune with the rest of the book, becuase if you look at a lot of them, they do flow with title they're in...not just the one book.

Phil
08-16-2004, 06:14 PM
b) I'll bet you use it more like Judd does, not with the nauseating frequency of Puck2.

So you've actually vommited from reading the dialogue?

Sir John A.
08-16-2004, 08:51 PM
Puck2 has used "eh" in phrases were it just didn't sound "natural" to this Canadian.

That's alright though because other writers did the same with Puck1.

kozzi24
08-16-2004, 09:42 PM
b) I'll bet you use it more like Judd does, not with the nauseating frequency of Puck2.


So you've actually vommited from reading the dialogue?

No, I just felt discomfort in the stomach and the urge to vomit, and felt disgust, which suits the definition of nauseated in both American and my UK dictionary.

Is everything OK with you, Phil?
Maybe I should PM this, but I'm not taking it personally.
You've been outright hostile to a lot of people this week.
Talk it out, son. You'll feel better.

Canucklehead
08-16-2004, 09:53 PM
I've always hated hearing "Canadians" say "eh" outside of real life (movies, comics etc). They over use it and never in the right circumstances. At least here in southern NB "eh" is used as a replacement of "isn't it" or "aren't they".

Ex.
Nice day, eh? -good
Hello, eh? -bad

D.

Sir John A.
08-17-2004, 04:44 AM
Canucklehead,

That's right, eh? :wink:

"Eh" tends to be used as an invitation for the other party to respond to a statement or question.

Ex: Pretty cold outside, eh?

Ben
08-17-2004, 11:50 AM
On the topic of "eh" I don't think Puck II usues more than many people do conversationally. I would honestly say I probably use it more than her, as would many around this area. You don't even notice it in a conversation as it is so common, eh? As for her proper or not so propper use of it, Scott has said that she doesn't just use it conversationally, but as a nervous habit. I'm willing to bet that if she could speak from the woomb, she could hear as well. She no doubt picked up on her daddy's use of "eh" and it became a crutch of sorts for her.

Ben ... eh?

P.S. Kozzi, if you get sick to yer tummy when you hear that much "eh", better not head east of Quebec any time soon, eh? ;)

kozzi24
08-17-2004, 12:19 PM
I get sick to my stomach when hearing it overused inappropriately. Your explanation is good enough, but doesn't blunt my feelings. If Scott Lobdell was Canadian, I'd probably not feel so strongly about it. I am, however, an American with eyes wide open and recognize a bad stereotype when I see it. I'm not against having her say it, I just would prefer to see it used correctly, not as a joke that is stereotyping instead of funny!
Canucklehead seems to have provided a perfect guideline for writers as to its use.

Mokole
08-17-2004, 07:47 PM
In my family my mother uses it tons, mostly in questions or when she's confused. Like other people use 'huh'. Most people don't hear it in their speech unless it's pointed out to them, eh?

And note, Zuzha never says 'eh' in issue #6. 8)

Phil
08-17-2004, 10:52 PM
No, I just felt discomfort in the stomach and the urge to vomit, and felt disgust, which suits the definition of nauseated in both American and my UK dictionary.

So a two letter word in a fictional story makes you ill?
Geez....


Is everything OK with you, Phil?
Maybe I should PM this, but I'm not taking it personally.
You've been outright hostile to a lot of people this week.
Talk it out, son. You'll feel better.

Technically I haven't been hostile at all, just counter-acting people's insensitive trolling and flaming by pointing out facts and my own opinion.

I feel fine and need no talking out, I'm not the one that's feeling ill by reading a fictional story about Canadian superheroes....

Feel free to PM away though.

Mokole
08-18-2004, 01:37 AM
I figure we'll see some more evolution of the characters by issue #10. Lobdell will still write in the humour as he sees fit but we've seen a lot of respect from him for his characters, especially Centenniel.

He's had Princeton be a police officer, military man, and we've seen his 3 powers plus his views on some important history. He cares about people and loves life, and is looking forward to his future as a hero. :)

He'll reveal Zuzha's powers soon (I'm betting on at least a glimpse in #7 in two weeks) and has her character pretty well fleshed out already. She is starting to like being an AF hero already but is unsure. 8)

Sadler may be a 'boy scout' but he's sincere in his duty and has a backbone. Like Rutherford he wants to be an AF hero. He has a lot more than just being nice to use. :wink:

p.s. And does anyone think the solicits to AF 7 and 8 are backwards? Of course the solicits may make no sense, again. Unlike the covers, which 5 out of 6 have had something to do with the story (envious, X fans?) :P

Issues 7 and 8 will be more enjoyable than people think. And it's good having ladymako, varo, kozzi, Dana, Ben, Phil, Legerd et al along for the ride :D

kozzi24
08-18-2004, 09:22 AM
What has me unsettled is the overuse and inappropriate use.
I know Scott's trying to be funny. I also know that there is a butt to every joke. If you say anything funny other than a pun on words, SOMEONE is bound to be upset.
It's also true that stereotypes become stereotypes because they're true. A lot of Canadians (and others) say "eh?" Enough Canadians do, that it is a stereotype.
It can be used well in characterization. It helped give Puck1 a unique voice in the team book, and it was almost always used appropriately, eh?
Scott use in the early issues was beyond appropriate use, and done so frequently as to not be funny, but be a bad stereotype.
I'm pretty mainstream, and I've gotten myself in trouble because people misinterpretted humor and/or made more of it than should have been (like repeated a one-liner out of context as if it was said solely to insult someone else. I do not respect political correctness boundaries in my attempts at humor, but respect that there has to be some limit out of respect for people's feelings.
But I cringe anytime any time I see a group being portrayed inappropriately.
I'm Polish descent. I found Scott's Polish character from World Tour funny. But if that character turned up constantly and never had any use other thean to be stupid, that would be an insult. If Captain Britain eats limes or Falcon eats watermelons in every appearance, those would be insults.
His humor was perpetuating a stereotype, and that was what got me more unsettled each time it happened.
Issue 6 didn't seem to have that problem. It was first traded around here circa #2 or 3, so maybe by pointing this out, we've helped the writer along?

JohnnyCanuck
08-19-2004, 01:56 AM
You know, this is really sad.


It wasn't until 1991 when I went to a then-AF writer's guest appearance at a comics store, that I learned an awful truth. Said writer, (who shall remain nameless), said that everyone at Marvel "hated" Alpha Flight, that he "hated" it also, and that he only took the book because no one else would touch it. (The writer left the book not long after that.)



Sounds like Fabian N.
Man was he an *******. I met him at a con up here and he was just a complete jerk.

JohnnyCanuck
08-19-2004, 02:18 AM
Ok, eh?
For the best usage of the word "eh" Bob and Doug McKenzie. They use correctly everytime, never out of place. Maybe a touch often but always correctly.

Ok, so, Good Day ,eh?