Great Beasts and the Great Beasts of Antiquity?

[-K-M-]

Should we simply merge them together, as I'm sure their the same Beasts after all these "new" Great Beasts have been popping up.

[Ben]

I'd say so.

[-K-M-]

and what should the pages be renamed too? "Unknown Great Beast I"?

1. http://www.alphaflight.net/alphanex/index.php?title=Great_Beast_of_Antiquity_I
2. http://www.alphaflight.net/alphanex/index.php?title=Great_Beast_of_Antiquity_II

[Ben]

my initial thought is Great Beast (unnamed) 1 and Great Beast (unnamed) 2

[Le Messor]

I agree with Ben on how to name them, but I'm a little more antsy about combining the pages; I'm a stickler for the limited numbers.

I'll accept whatever decision, tho'.

- Le Messor
"Genius is ten percent inspiration and fifty percent capital gains."

[-K-M-]

I agree with Ben on how to name them, but I'm a little more antsy about combining the pages; I'm a stickler for the limited numbers.

I'll accept whatever decision, tho'.

- Le Messor
"Genius is ten percent inspiration and fifty percent capital gains."

technically all we would be doing is removing one page (Great Beast of Antiquity) and renaming the other 2.

[Le Messor]

Sorry, I meant the limited numbers of Great Beasts, not the limited numbers of pages.

- Le Messor
"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit in a boat all day drinking beer."

[-K-M-]

There still will be the same amount of Great Beasts pages, just the ones listed in the GB of Antiquity will be put into the main GB bio and just renamed.

[Flightpath07]

lol. Anybody find it funny that there are "new" Great Beasts of Antiquity? I mean, I know they aren't really new, but it sure does sound silly, don't it?