Sorry, I just keep getting stuck on b!tching about it. It's mindblowing.
Yes, that I do.
Printable View
I think #51 onwards is where it starts to get better, as the Mantlo run winds it's way down.
I'm a big fan of the Jim Lee art and the Dream Queen storyline.
#52-53 may make you see Mac in a different light though, so maybe you won't enjoy them as much.
oooh, no. :( I was actually going to read #52 because that's the one titled "FLASHBACK!", right?
I do like the Jim Lee art.
Ugh. How did you all stick it through Not Alpha??
The original characters are the ONLY reason I am still reading this series.
And as of now, there aren't any originals on the team.
It's Lee's first work for Marvel.
All the stuff about Mac will get better, too.
In my case, at first because we kept getting promises from the creative team that 'it'll turn around with issue #, we promise!'; 'it'll be more of what you love after issue #, we swear!', but ultimately because I knew it was limited.
V2: I was actually lining up at the store to dump it when they told me it was getting cancelled very soon. So, I thought why not buy two or so more issues?
V3: I enjoyed it (though it was baaad) so that wasn't a problem. (Also, the promises above.)
v4 and Omega Flight? I knew from the beginning they'd only end up being limited. (All were originally slated to be ongoing series; Omega and v4 were both dropped back to limited / minis before issue 1 hit the stands.) Also, I liked Omega Flight, Non Alpha or not.
Even though v4 was the original characters, I wouldn't have stuck with it the way it was written. Your mileage may vary.
Other people? Because they enjoyed them:
See Phil's comments on another thread that v2 is what brought him here.
A lot of peeps really liked v4 - as mentioned, it was the originals. Personally, I just didn't like that it was about the angriest thing I've ever read, with them screaming in my face all the time about 'how dare you not be a minority!?! Evil!' and the v2-like 'Mind control! Mind control! Oooh!' storyline.
I don't think anybody really loved v3, but it was only 12 issues in the end.
~ Le Messor
"Equality of opportunity means equal opportunity to be unequal."
~ Iain MacLeod
and
Indeed it was! She put Snowbird back in there and I was able to piece my heart back together!
As expected. If you didn't complain, I'd be more worried.
Don't because...
... this! ^^^
I believe the intention was to replace Alpha Flight entirely. Bill does good if he has a clean slate. This is why I think he initially did so well with ROM and MICRONAUTS which were both fun stories to read. (Not very much character development in either one, but they were still that comic you read for just some brainless fun).
When V2 came out, I recall enjoying the series. I recently tried to re-read it, and couldn't get past the original artists' work. Especially how he drew uh... "Mac" (to spare any potential spoilers).
I enjoyed Radius (and his origin), as well as his half-brother (though the origin they tried to peg for him, to me, was too much of a stretch and I don't think ever got confirmed). I strongly dislike Man-Bot or whatever his name was. But for the worse character in Alpha Flight history, second place goes to Murmur. First place goes to - if you can count him, since it wasn't in an ALPHA FLIGHT series, goes to Earth Mover. (Worse character even in ALPHA FLIGHT history, you probably know who I'd say it was...)
This was the "comedy" one, right? Scott was writing?
I enjoyed Volume 4, because it "reset" Alpha Flight. Were they a little more angry? Sure, but consider what they have been through, wouldn't you be pissed too? :)
I liked them having an edge. I feel like that's something Alpha Flight needed. For too long, they have been treated like a joke. I think, in part, because of how Volume 1 came about after Byrne's departure. It was so horribly handled - and not just from Bill. I think in the Marvel offices, new people were tossed onto Alpha Flight, to try and do something with it, simply because it was tied to the X-Men and the X-Men were popular back then, so they wanted to see if someone could make something happen. But they didn't want to put big names on there, because they were reserved to Marvel's core, big titles (FF, Hulk, Avengers, X-Men, etc). As a result, with so many writers and artists who walked through the original volume of Alpha Flight, it became almost unbearable, confusing, and a nightmare. I don't think anyone, post Byrne, ever cared about their assignment on Alpha Flight, and basically did what they had to, to keep their jobs.
So "rebooting"/resetting Alpha Flight with some edge, I think would have been what it needed. For the market readers to say, "Oh, hey, here's this team that's not going to put up with any Bull$#!+!"
Sadly, we did not get to see that develop into a series, right when we had a great artist on it, and a writer who expressed interest in making something of Alpha Flight...
My friend just received the first 10 issues of Byrne's run, so I'm going to re-read it while she's reading it for the first time. :D
I could probably use to do it anyway since so much character development and happenings are awesomely crammed into those first 10 issues.
I liked Volume 2, 3 and 4.
They weren't Byrne's Alpha Flight but then again nothing else was/will be.
Hell, even Byrne ran out of ideas and enthusiasm for the team. Who's to say that if he stayed on the book his run wouldn't have been even worse than Mantlo's?
No one is ever going to be able to recreate those first 28 issues and that's what made them so unique and enjoyable.
I don't think writers should be trying to imitate that run; they've got to try and do something similarly unique - sometimes it hits, others it misses; them's the breaks.
And I like Earthmover.
Then just take it; take another little piece of my heart!
iirc, that was spoilered before #1 hit the stands.
I'd already learned to hate cartoony art long before then, especially when teamed up with dark, murky colouring.
Wait... Did Alan Davis draw a single issue? Or was it Neary? (Which would contradict something I said on another thread.)
Llan.
Indeed.
Doesn't make me enjoy the book.
I don't want to read about a bunch of angry characters being angry. I don't like anybody when they're angry.
Which is odd, because I often look at those big titles and wonder how this deservedly obscure person got the book!
I'm not sure he did, either.
In other words, a pretty generic team.
Well, the world's a twisted place.
Always a possibility. I have noticed he has a short attention span; maybe it's good he only stays a few issues on any given title?
I dunno, Alpha Flight Classics did a pretty good job...
And I know who Earthmover is!
~ Le Messor
"Life is an endurance test, so why be ashamed of your age?"
~ P.K. Shaw
Phil-
You are so...positive.
How many times have you made lemonade now? :P
Seriously, though, you are really positive. It kind of balances the thread out, what, with my instant traumatic/dramatic/freak-out posts I make everytime I read another issue now.
Thank you. :D
I am still stuck in the Vol #1 phase of AF. Only because been having a hard time finding the later AF Vols. After getting past Byrne's run, I kinda skipped around reading issues. Some have through me for a loop i.e. Walter as a women, the worst villain being Hedlock. But I have enjoyed reading AF so far. But the funniest thing to me during this whole time of being romanced by Canada's heroes is when the scrambled eggs went crazy! I sent that out to other Native Americans and warned them that could happen with our commodity powder eggs. (Native Humor).
I looked at the scene again with Sasquatch and Gary Cody in issue 51. I don't think Walter was flirting with Cody. I think Walter was just being a smart alec (and I don't mean Alec Thorne ;)
Actually June Brigman drew issue #52. Jim Lee already needed a fill in artist after drawing one issue. The guy draws so good I always forgive his lateness.
You may want to read AF Annual #2 next since it takes place between issues #51 and #52. June also drew Annual #2. But the story features a lot of Heather so you may not want to read it then. But it does contain a cool fight with Box and a T-Rex. Dinosaurs sure get abused alot in comic books. Where is PETA when you need them?
Well I looked at it as I still have 3 Byrne characters on the team. Heather wearing the Vindicator suit. Madison Jeffries wearing the Box armor. And Sasquatch wearing Snowbird's body. And Jim Lee's art helped alot. I think Editor in Chief Jim Shooter had some rule that every issue is someone's first issue. Mantlo would have Jim Lee draw 4 years of Alpha Flight history in flashback scenes in almost every issue. There was no Wikipedia back then to read up on every character's origin and current status.Quote:
Ugh. How did you all stick it through Not Alpha??
The original characters are the ONLY reason I am still reading this series.
And as of now, there aren't any originals on the team.
Sounds like you've been getting the best of the best, though.
Lol! That is great! :D
I've just checked; I was thinking of v2 #6, which was a Hitch / Neary joint.
I associate Davis and Neary because Neary inked him on one of his series.
Seconded!
~ Le Messor
"Most of the time we don't communicate; we just take turns talking."
That's nicely put, Phil; all of it (you're very verbose, my friend!). All of the various Alpha series(es?) have something good about them, most of them quite a few things. And some bad also, quite a few bad things actually. But, for each of us, those bad and good things will be different for each reader.
Volume 3, even though it was a 'joke' and handled flippantly, and a mess at times, was what drew me to Alpha, or at least back to Alpha. I had quit reading in the late 50's (issues, not my age or the year), and got rid of ALL my comics. When i heard that Alpha was coming back for a Volume 3, i didn't even know that Volume 1 had ended! While i waited for Volume 3 to come out, i hit eBay (ouch!) and collected all of Volume 1 and 2. Long story short, here i am, you can't get rid of me now! (Well, you could block my IP...but surely SOMEBODY would miss me!)
And, Phil, you are the glue that stirs the drink, sir!
Oh! Ha, you are probably correct. I mean, I took it as a joke, just not for the same reasons. :D
I haven't even read Annual #1 yet because I forgot about it. Oops! I can read both of those here soon, then, before I read #52.
Another positive thinker! <3
Because I don't count those three as original Alpha members (I didn't think of Madison Jeffries) because Heather is different and wasn't really a member until Mantlo's run (and even if so, I still don't her count because she is awful), and Sasquatch I don't count, I guess, because he isn't in his original orange suit or human form.
So you can warn her about what follows after issue #28...
Like I said, I originally liked Volume 2. But the art, when I tried to re-read it, was... bad. And Murmur and Manbot? Finally an Alpha Flight character created that I hate more than Manikin...
I don't think someone should try to recreate it - but others should follow the established character personalities. This is what I think did not happen.
And how can you possibly like Earthmover. Please sell me on how he's a good character. (Seriously! I'd like to hear it!) But I can't say too much, I actually liked Wyre, and I know a lot of people disliked him.
So help me if that song gets stuck in my head...
I meant for Crackity. :)
By far. The worse. You are correct. But I am surprised you were able to guess. I am usually so subtle about my hatred of the character...
Worse villain being Headlok? You must have skipped the Llan the Sorcerer story, my friend. LOL
The Rouleau stuff was quite stylistic and I can see why people didn't like it.
I personally wouldn't use the term bad though.
Yeah, Murmur was pretty redundant but was an important part of the Legacy sub plot they were building and never got to.Quote:
And Murmur and Manbot? Finally an Alpha Flight character created that I hate more than Manikin...
Manbot didn't have a chance to show any point or potential, again for the same reason.
These are fictional characters though; you can only follow established personalities for so long without repeating them. Hence re-creation.Quote:
I don't think someone should try to recreate it - but others should follow the established character personalities. This is what I think did not happen.
Earthmover is essentially Shaman & Talisman; a normal every day citizen pulled into a legacy of shaman magic.Quote:
And how can you possibly like Earthmover. Please sell me on how he's a good character. (Seriously! I'd like to hear it!)
To write one off is to write the other two off.
The problem with him is essentially the same as Murmur; he was a redundant character because Shaman & Talisman existed and fulfilled the role, and that he literally got 2 issues of guest appearances before being reduced to silent cameos.
He's my fourth favourite Alphan after Sasquatch, Puck and Wild Child.Quote:
But I can't say too much, I actually liked Wyre, and I know a lot of people disliked him.
I saw no problem in Llan as a character whatsoever.Quote:
Worse villain being Headlok? You must have skipped the Llan the Sorcerer story, my friend. LOL
Just the resolution of the arc.
IMO, it's okay to ADD to personalities of characters, but not change them.
Which is what I feel has happened a LOT in what I've read of Mantlo's run so far.
You start changing pre-loved and established characters, you kill off a good portion of your loyal audience, imo.
I definitely agree to an extent but there's a very blurred line between adding and changing, and a distinct one between changing and contrasting.
My personality has changed from 5 years ago; I've grown/evolved/natured/nurtured/endured.
Change is fine as long as there's a justifiable, logical reason.
What I meant by "add to characters' personalities" is that, obviously characters are going to go through written experiences which will add to what they are and (blurred line of "add" and "change" here) that may somewhat change how they are, but to make them completely different than how they started and were initially established? No.
Heather was a strong woman BEFORE entering Mantlo's run. He didn't have to put her into a suit and make her Mega B!tch leader to establish that she was a strong leader. Because that didn't make her strong. It just made her a b!tch, imo.
She is completely different than when Byrne wrote her. Yes, her situation changed, he could have added that to her life experiences, but not make her a completely different character like he did.
Also: I've changed as well over the past 5 years. But I'm not a fictional character. People aren't reading my life with the expectations of knowing who I am. ;)
Then in that case Mantlo didn't change the characters personalities, he completely contradicted what was already established, with no good reason.
Which is poor writing.
Which I totally agree with you on.
Does that then raise the question that we have expectations of these characters?Quote:
People aren't reading my life with the expectations of knowing who I am.
We don't own them, we didn't create them, we have no claim to them...
(Being devil's advocate here, I'm 90% with you on Mantlo's issues)
Well, at least we agree that it just sucked. And he ruined my Heather.
Yes, we expect a certain amount of fundamental consistencies in our fictional characters, I think. At least I do.
It's what makes them relatable.
Whether or not I have a right to expect that, it's what I do. :D
One decision keeps popping up for me about AF# 44: if your leader (Heather) or your team-mates (Judd and Jeffries) KNOW that your powers are going to get negated if you touch your sibling, why on earth would you split the team up and have Northstar and Aurora in the same group, in a cave, going after a foe who beat them handily the first time?
Because you have hopes of killing off the last of your team so that you can make an Alpha Flight team ALL YOUR OWN that consists of a Mind Raper, a guy who lusts after said under-aged Mind Raper (but he splits into three different guys, so COOL and YAY!), a guy who you suddenly have become attracted to, and a Not Sasquatch/Snowbird/whatever. And all of these thoughts hit you in a splash page at the end of the book as you ponder, in depth, how your new, ALL-YOUR-OWN AF team is better than your deceased husband's and how you are better than your deceased husband, and your justifications for SUCKING. BADLY.
<---Bitter. Will always be bitter over how Heather was changed. ALWAYS.
I can relate, CJ.
Different people have different interpretations of ALPHA FLIGHT, but I agree whole-heartedly with your assessment of why the illogical grouping.
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
Don't read vol. 4 with the expectation that Heather gets treated better. She doesn't. [poor, defenseless cousins...]
Funny, I felt the same way. As I was buying it, I was enjoying it a great deal. Maybe it was just the "buzz" of finally having some of these characters available again.
But when I read it again a couple of years later I was trying to remember what I liked. The art was often brutal and the new characters were completely unappealing to me. The book, by and large, is a giant mess.
He, my friend, had potential. Granted, the first time he flew out in the sunlight, he got covered in concrete and ended up stuck on the edge of a building, but still, at least he didn't get wet.
What's sad is, it's a cover version that's stuck in mine, not the Janis original. :(
Who isn't even an Alpha villain. He just appeared in that one issue.
1. I agree with you on holding fictional characters to different, and higher, standards to real people.
2. Actually, we are. See... this thread. ;)
Also, completely suddenly, out of the blue. No build up or organic flow-through. It's like a giant ant farm.
Ah, yes, the ages old question; who really owns the characters? The creators or the fans?
Normally asked about Star Wars characters after the prequels.
It's unambiguously true we didn't create them (then again, neither did Bill Mantlo - at least, he didn't create the Alphans who got most of us reading the series) ; legally, we don't own them - though some people (in the Star Wars example) argue that we do, more than the people who did create them and more than those who legally owning them.
I leave all that to the philosophers.
What I will say is two things:
1... The creators / owners are trying to sell us these characters. If they want us to keep buying, they need to keep either meeting our expectations, or breaking them in a good way.
B) We, the fans, have invested a lot of money, time, and emotion in these characters. How many covers of each appearance of AF does Rob have, for example? If that doesn't give us some claim over them, what does? No, that wouldn't hold up in a court of law; but this is a court of public opinion.
Sniff... so true.
~ Le Messor
"They say any lawyer who represents himself has a fool! for a client. As God is my witness, I am that fool!"
~ Gomez
Le Messor, you're giving me goosebumps.
Unfortunately, at this point, right NOW, I couldn't care less about Heather.
And THAT is what ticks me off the MOST.
I went from ADORING her, thinking she was damn-near-perfect, to absolutely not giving a crap about her, to wishing they'd just kill her off because she's THAT BAD.
All in, what, 22 issues. Yes, 22 issues.
Wow, that's a lot of issues, actually.
And Heather has been horrid in every single one of those issues.
#52 was the worst issue I have read so far.
You guys want me to list all the things wrong with it? Or do you remember?
*Heather hits an all-time high in stupidity.
*Mantlo states very clearly (via Box/Jeffries) that Knapp is a med school graduate, which means he is clearly well over an age to be trying to...wait, NO ONE should be trying to sex up a 13 year old.
*I believe NOTHING of what was said about Mac. I won't accept it. I won't. I know it's going to be undone just like the elves thing, right?
Those are the only three things I am listing that was wrong with the issue for now.
This issue SUCKED.
I am unhappy.
I cannot believe all the f*#kery that just happened in this book. Heather needs to just go away.
And is Gary Cody dead??
I am so blasted pissed at #52.
MAKE NOTE OF THIS: #52 was the WORST ALPHA FLIGHT ISSUE EVER.
Was Rouleau the first or second artist? Another artist came on who was more cartoony - I found that more bearable.
Keep in mind, when I say bad - I mean by the standard I'd expect and hope from Marvel. Most of Marvel's artists could draw circles around me on their worse day, and be better than me at my best. (Though the current Uncanny X-Men artist, whoever, the Hades that is - I feel I might have a fair shot at beating artistically!)
We got, what, 20 issues? That was more than enough time to inject some personality, besides a one dimensional piece of cardboard.
Right, everyone changes. But not so drastically, usually, without it being:
- A major event in their life
- Mental illness
He had the personality of a rock.
And that's insulting some of my pet rocks I had in my youth!
Redundant can easily exist. I thought Shaman and Talisman, were pretty much the same. But they each stuck out. Aurora and Northstar are the same, but they stuck out.
Why?
Personality!
Really? Earthmover? Over Snowbird? Shaman? Talisman? Aurora? Northstar?
Well, you're entitled to be wrong. LOL
And then this happened....
Which is what I was trying to say! You just agreed because Crackity is a woman! And she used her womanly charms! And better explanations! LOL
Because Heather is a dumb ass, once she put on the costumes? That's my guess.
She might have gotten worse Alpha Flight character ever created - only pre-costumed Heather saves her from that role, when she was actually an amazing character and very believable.
Don't worry. There's plenty I will always be bitter about in comics.
- Heather in a costume
- Snowbird killed
- Walter killed
- Walter brought back as a woman
And that's just in Alpha Flight... if we go beyond Alpha Flight, I'd crash the server with all my complaints...
LOL! So. So. So. So. VERY true.
Yes, it felt like story wise, after re-reading it - the writer had a very, very, very, very loose notion of where he was going - but seemed to have "related" plot lines he was just pulling from a hat. It didn't feel focused.
He could have stayed in the sun.
Same. I always think of ROUGH CUTT's version, because, sadly that's where I heard it first. And is, my preference.
I would like to say it gets better... that Heather gets better... But... no.
If you feel a shiver down your spine, don't worry. It's probably just the wind.
Um... Yes, it will be fixed.
And, he shows up alive later.
Actually, circles are very, very hard to draw.
And the whole being right thing.
I think mine's by Jenny Morris.
~ Le Messor
"Most of the people who are writing advertising today have never had to sell anything to anybody. They've never seen a consumer."
I have no womanly charm. Even when I try it's ruined by me either sneezing, tripping over myself and falling, partially walking into a wall or doorway, freaking out over a bug, a panic attack, a paper cut, accidental work-related injury, a lack of good depth perception, or saying the wrong, stupidest thing at the wrong time (is there EVER a right time to say something stupid?).