Same here, Suzene! I saw that one and thought they were really unprofessional. Dale actually called him out on it on Twitter, saying that the script called specifically for the area around the Harbour Centre Lookout. It's not "all glass" around there! It's, well, exactly the way Dale showed it.
GARR, these people make me angry sometimes. The whole section on Vancouver (including the other comment that "Eaglesham does what most comic artists do: draw Generic Stand-In City for whatever city that writer's decided to set the story in.") should have been removed from the review once he was corrected publicly. Leaving it in just spreads lies to people who don't know any better. Besides, Dale always does thorough research on the locations being used, with Google Earth and Street View, etc. AND he does this even though he has 8 issues to draw in 8 months! You would think people would appreciate that kind of dedication and attention to detail.
What strikes me most is just how hard so-called "reviewers" try to dig for things to pick on, rather than giving props for the strong elements. It's so rare to see an educated review that doesn't come off as a bunch of fan-boys (no offense intended, we love our geeks!) trying to feel important by tearing people down.
Okay, I'm done now...