That's not a contradiction though; that's unspecified, off-panel development.
Contradiction would be saying that Volume 4 never happened and that Mac & Heather have never fought before, or don't have a child.
That I agree on.Even a splash page recap would take no more space
That's the point though; we don't need to know what the fight was about to understand what a fight is.I disagree because we actually don't know what the fight was about. We're just told that there was one.
If Heather says 'we had a fight' a new reader knows what a fight is because it's a commonly shared occurrence - they don't need to know the backstory.
I agree. They SHOULD have done that in #8.They can't even be bothered with a basic mention. "We fought over Clare again". Five words solve several complaints; you know why, you ackowledge their kid, and you indicate that it's fairly common.
They didn't so it will be awkward to do so in #9-12
If Amazing X-Men #8 was your first ever comic, how would you know where to look though?No, you don't need all of that stuff because if someone wants to find out, the material IS out there.
Again, I agree; footnotes, like recap pages, solve this issue so easily. I'm a big fan of footnotes.I don't know if Marvel never ever does footnotes anymore, but restoring it to say "see Alpha Flight volume four" is hardly an insurmountable barrier, if the dialogue alone doesn't do enough to explain that she took off under a bad situation, came back, and the whole thing put a strain on their marriage.
Marvel doesn't use them though. Possibly because most readers these days are edging towards trades and digital comics where the footnote becomes obsolete.
You're saying that as a Mac & Heather fan, and someone who read Volume 4.The things I refer to, that I feel should have been handled better, are things that are NOT stated anywhere. There was nothing to suggest that Mac and Heather were back together or that Heather had a change of heart about Mac being a suitable father. It's just thrown out there out of nowhere.
The small detail doesn't change the plot of the story; yes it makes 18,000 continuity fans (myself included) sleep a bit easier, but it isn't essential to the plot. Unfortunately.
Not bringing something up is different to ignoring something though.There's no point in having a shared universe if things that happen to a character in one book are ignored in others.
It is still accordingly though; until the moment it specifically contradicts it - If the characters suddenly announced they'd never had a baby or that they'd never had a fight, I'd be screaming from the rooftops.I'm not expecting the writers to build on what happened in AF v4, but I do expect them to recognize that it happened and write accordingly.
I agree with a lot of what everyone, including you, has been saying - there are things that should have been handled better. It wasn't. This was why I didn't like the issue.
However, now that it hasn't been mentioned trying to mention it later in the arc will just tie the story in knots.